UK Legal Blogs

In Volume 8, Issue 1 of “Legal Information Management,” from the British and Irish Association of Law Librarians, James Mullen and Jennifer Vass offer a list of British legal blogs. These blogs will be helpful for keeping up to date with UK legal and law library developments.

Here is a sample of the blogs mentioned:

Charon QC http://charonqc.wordpress.com/  includes links to podcasts.

Current Awareness from Inner Temple Library http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/ 

Infolaw    http://www.infolaw.co.uk/ provides a directory of blogs

BIALL Blog http://biall.blogspot.com/

Running Librarian  http://ligissues.blogspot.com/

 Mullan, James & Vass, Jennifer. Blogging for Law Librarians. Legal Information Management, Vol.8 #1 pp.31-34 (Spring 2008).

The article is available online if your institution subscribes to Cambridge Journals Online .

 

 

 

 

Authentication: The Next Frontier in Online Government Resources

This is cross-posted on the freegovinfo.info blog:

On a daily basis I visit various court and other government websites, often to locate recent opinions, regulations, or agency decisions.  It is a common practice for law librarians and for any researcher who wants very recent sources or does not have access to commercial databases.  Admittedly it is far less often that I consider whether the case I just downloaded is an authentic representation of the court’s decision.

But consider these two examples.  The first from the California Courts website and the second from the website for the First Circuit Court of Appeals:

“The Official Reports page is primarily intended to provide effective public access to all of California’s precedential appellate decisions; it is not intended to function as an alternative to commercial computer-based services and products for comprehensive legal research.”

“Although every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on this site is correct and timely, the First Circuit does not warrant its accuracy. Portions of the information may be incorrect or not current. The information contained on this site should not be cited as legal authority.”

In 2007 the American Association of Law Librarians completed a survey of states’ online statutes, regulations and case law to determine which states, if any, were deeming their online material to be official and/or authentic.  The survey, “State-by-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources,” is available from the Washington Affairs Office of AALL.  Survey authors Richard Matthews and Mary Alice Baish concluded that while many states considered the primary legal material that they put online to be official, no state had taken steps to authenticate those materials. 

In a world where online research is becoming the norm, are courts (and other government websites) really keeping up with the needs of the people they serve by not offering official and authenticated versions of their opinions online?

Open Access Legal Scholarship

Open access is in the news following Harvard Law School’s announcement “Harvard Law faculty votes for ‘open access’ to scholarly articles”

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2008/05/07_openaccess.php

There has been coverage on the story by Bloomberg.com, “Harvard Law School to Distribute Research for Free

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aTV432mbXYtY

and the Harvard Crimson, “Law School Adopts Open Access for Scholarship – Proposal was written by Palfrey, cyberlaw expert and incoming library chief.”

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=523514

Duke Law School has made its journals available on the web since 1997, and has hosted an open access repository of its faculty’s scholarship since December 2005.  The repository is accessible at: http://www.law.duke.edu/scholarship/repository .  You can read about Duke’s long-time commitment to open access in this paper:

Danner, Richard A. (2007) Applying the Access Principle in Law: The Responsibilities of the Legal Scholar. International Journal of Legal Information, 35 pp. 355-395, http://eprints.law.duke.edu/1698/ .

Here at Stanford, and at many other schools I’m sure, we’re talking about it.

 

National Archives Creates Plan for Online Access to Founding Fathers Papers

[Found this interesting news on: BeSpacific]
Press Release
(from archives.gov)

May 7, 2008
National Archives Creates Plan for Online Access to Founding Fathers Papers

Washington, DC. . . On Tuesday, May 6, 2008, Archivist of the United States Allen Weinstein submitted a report, entitled The Founders Online, to the Committees on Appropriations of the U.S. Congress. This report is the National Archives response to concerns raised by the Committees that the complete papers of America’s Founding Fathers are not available online. The Founders Online is a plan for providing online access, within a reasonable timeframe, to researchers, students and the general public. The report is available electronically at the National Archives website: http://www.archives.gov/nhprc/publications.

In announcing the completion of the report, Professor Weinstein said, “We feel this plan would provide scholars and the public access to the best available versions of the complete papers; it would also protect the longstanding interests of the publishers and host organizations which along with the Federal government have invested great resources in the past four decades. Most importantly, it would build a monument to the Founders of our nation in their own words.”

The National Archives received suggestions from the editors of the papers of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington, university publishers, and others in crafting a blueprint for providing access to the already completed print editions and the raw materials for the editions to come. If carried out, the plan ensures that interested readers worldwide can see the work in progress with the already complete editions accompanied by transcriptions of the papers yet to be published. To hasten the transition process, the National Historical Publications and Records Commission plans to invest $250,000 as a demonstration pilot project.

The plan outlines three basic steps that remain:

* Digitizing the existing 217 volumes and publishing the Papers on a single website to allow for research and inquiry across America’s Founding Era collections;

* Transcribing and otherwise preparing for publishing on the web the remaining papers (approximately 90,000 documents) and replacing these raw materials with authoritative annotated versions as these are completed; and

* Creating an independent oversight process to ensure that rigorous performance goals are established and met by the parties carrying out all aspects of the work.