Oregon Revised Statutes – Copyright Hearing Update

For those of you following the question regarding the copyright of Oregon’s Revised Statutes, you might want to visit: public.resource.org/oregon

The State of Oregon has scheduled a hearing for June 19, 2008 to “consider its copyright policy in light of technological developments and the Internet.”

And, the Public.Resource site now has links to the testimony submitted by Carl Malamud, Tim Stanley and Karl Olson.

Also, if you want to listen to the hearing on Thursday, June 19th, there is a Real Video feed available .

 

Understanding and Mastering The Bluebook

A recent legal research and writing (LRW) title of interest concerning The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation) is:

Understanding and Mastering The Bluebook : A Guide for Students and Practitioners
by Linda J. Barris

Type:        Book; English
Publisher:    Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, ©2007.
ISBN:    9781594603655 1594603650
OCLC:    123391085
Related Subjects:
Citation of legal authorities — United States.
Annotations and citations (Law) — United States.

Table of Contents:
Chapter 1: Getting Started
Chapter 2: Cases
Chapter 3: Statutes
Chapter 4: Constitutions
Chapter 5: Secondary Sources
Chapter 6: Procedural and Court Rules
Chapter 7: Litigation Documents and Record Citations
Chapter 8: Signals and Explanatory Parentheticals
Chapter 9:    Quotations
Chapter 10: Capitalization
Chapter 11: Numbers, Numerals and Symbols
Appendix: Citing Electronic Sources

Collaboration in legal research and writing classes


Real Collaborative Context: Opinion Writing and the Appellate Process

Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, Forthcoming

THOMAS D. COBB, University of Washington School of Law

SARAH F. KALTSOUNIS, University of Washington School of Law

Collaborative learning is crucial to law students’ intellectual development and professional formation. Yet something about the forms of collaboration we typically adopt has always produced the sense that collaborative learning has failed to achieve some of its most ambitious goals. This article articulates a more engaging and empowering approach to collaboration, one that asks law students to participate in aspects of legal practice or judging that involve group decision making – such as appellate judging. By participating in these processes, students gain a more sophisticated understanding of judicial decision making, and how its social aspects influence legal reasoning. In addition, students and teachers who experiment with these collaborative reasoning processes may position themselves to help improve group decision making in a variety of areas of legal practice.

Source:  LSN Young Scholars Law APS Vol. 5 No. 27,  06/18/2008