Comments on: Thomson Reuters vs. Bloomberg http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/06/23/thomson-reuters-vs-bloomberg/ Brought to you by the Legal Research instructors at Stanford Law School Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:25:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Michael http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/06/23/thomson-reuters-vs-bloomberg/#comment-545 Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:57:28 +0000 http://legalresearchplus.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-545 For a side by side analysis of all electronic legal research providers. Check out postgression.com for market inteligence and bus deb. It is Bloomberg all the way. Never the less for legal research – you are better off with loislaw. That is all Bloomberg is. It licenses all content from kluwer.

What can be concluded. All legal research is contrnuting to the direct downfall of the legal librarian.

]]> By: George Wilson http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/06/23/thomson-reuters-vs-bloomberg/#comment-165 Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:04:39 +0000 http://legalresearchplus.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-165 Wow! That strikes me as truly something encouraging for Open Access when an asset manager of an old-line investment bank like First Boston questions the pricey proprietary online databases (and, specifically, “can no longer justify a Bloomberg terminal … and often turns to the Web for data”), no matter their uniqueness!

]]>