<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wikipedia Zeitgeist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/07/24/the-wikipedia-zeitgeist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/07/24/the-wikipedia-zeitgeist/</link>
	<description>Brought to you by the Legal Research instructors at Stanford Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Provenzale</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/07/24/the-wikipedia-zeitgeist/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Provenzale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchplus.wordpress.com/?p=294#comment-206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Godwin presents an interesting take on the value of Wikipedia in light of Google&#039;s just-launched competitive product, &lt;a href=&quot;http://knol.google.com/k#&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Knol&lt;/a&gt;. Knol&#039;s articles are written by named individuals, which I suppose means they would not get the same protections that anonymity affords. Wired has a pretty good article on what Knol is about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2008/07/google_knol?currentPage=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godwin presents an interesting take on the value of Wikipedia in light of Google&#8217;s just-launched competitive product, <a href="http://knol.google.com/k#" rel="nofollow">Knol</a>. Knol&#8217;s articles are written by named individuals, which I suppose means they would not get the same protections that anonymity affords. Wired has a pretty good article on what Knol is about <a href="http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2008/07/google_knol?currentPage=all" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

