New Book: Scholarly Communication in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan

Chandos publishing recently released a new mongraph: “Scholarly Communication in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan.” This work is edited by Xia Jingfeng, a reference librarian at Rutgers. It will be interesting to see if any regional repositories, open source platforms, or informal exchanges are emerging in these East Asian jursidictions.  Hat tip to the Tao Yang at Rutgers for alerting us to this interesting new title.

Summary from the Publisher’s Website:

This is one of the very few books that systematically explores the characteristics of scholarly communication outside the West. Over the last decade the advances in information technology have remodelled the foundation of scholarly communication. This book examines how countries/regions in East Asia (China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan) have reacted to the innovations in the conduct of research and in the exchange of ideas. It outlines the traditional systems of scholarly exchange in China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan, and then concentrates on the efforts of these countries/regions to provide revolutionary ways of writing, publishing, and reading of information produced by members of the academic community. It also discusses the achievements as well as challenges in the process of technology innovations, highlighting the uniqueness of practices in scholarly communication in this part of the world.

http://www.chandospublishing.com/chandos_publishing_record_detail.php?ID=163 

This is the final post from the Rocky Mountain branch of Legal Research Plus. Many thanks to our friends at the University of Denver Westminster Law Library for their help these past weeks. I look forward to joining my colleagues in Palo Alto for future postings.

Reports on Asian Legal Markets from ALB Legal News

ALB Legal News magazine has generously posted free reports on the legal market in individual Asian countries. The reports cover the outlook for the legal profession in each country, as well as specific legal sectors. In 2008, they have published reports on China, Singapore, Korea, India, Vietnam and the Philippnes.

ALB Legal News Reports http://asia.legalbusinessonline.com/reports/232/list.aspx

Creating course materials from the free case repository

Over on the Open Case Law Google group, law professor Patrick Wiseman writes:

” . . . [M]y interest in free caselaw is mostly for teaching purposes.  I’m putting together an all online US constitutional law course, using US Supreme Court decisions from the repository (and occasionally elsewhere for missing or more recent cases).  I thought perhaps this group might find what I’m doing with the cases of some interest, and so send you an example:

http://ul451.gsu.edu/courts.gov/c/editedUS/392/392.US.83.416.html

The case, which will take a moment or two to load fully as there’s some script stuff going on, is Flast v. Cohen, about the standing of taxpayers to challenge alleged congressional violation of the Establishment Clause.  Select an elision, [...], and see the elided text; note too that most US Supreme Court decisions cited within the decision are linked (either to an edited version of the case if I have one or to the original if not).  The styling will look familiar, as I have not (yet) restyled the cases much to give them my ‘brand’.”

 

Please do take a look (and wait the moment it takes for the page to load).  And note, too, how great a paragraph-based citation system, rather than vendor-specific page-based system, would work.

Beyond Borders in the Classroom – The Possibility of Transnational Legal Education

Beyond Borders in the Classroom – The Possibility of Transnational Legal Education

Ritsumeikan Law Review, Vol. 25, pp. 183-208, 2008
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/63

LUKE R. NOTTAGE, University of Sydney – Faculty of Law, University of Sydney – Australian Network for Japanese Law
FRANK BENNETT, Nagoya University – School of Law
KITTISAK PROKATI, Thammasat University – Faculty of Law
KENT WILLIAM YAMANAKA ANDERSON, Australian National University – ANU College of Law
LEON T. WOLFF, University of New South Wales – Faculty of Law
MAKOTO IBUSUKI, Ritsumeikan University – College of Law

This is an edited transcript of a panel discussion, a popular format in Japanese law journals, from a conference held in Kyoto on transnational legal education. Two professors based in Japan join with three based in Australia, and one from Thailand, to compare and assess various experiments in recent years.

One model involves students physically crossing borders. Some take entire degrees abroad, as with the Masters programs at Nagoya and Kyushu Universities. Other students increasingly take some courses abroad. For instance, the “Canberra Seminar” in Australian law includes a week of “Legal English” before a week introducing key areas and principles of the common law most interesting for law students from Japan. A more ambitious example is the “Kyoto Seminar” in Japanese law, involving both Japanese and non-Japanese professors and students in teaching and learning. In another variant, students sometimes get partial credit for activities abroad, like some students from Australia who have participated very successfully in the Intercollegiate Negotiation and Arbitration Competition in Tokyo. Difficulties include the costs involved for students (and their home institutions). This has led to some law schools instead developing more courses taught in English, involving permanent or visiting professors abroad, as in Thailand.

Another more recent approach uses Information Technology to run courses in parallel in different jurisdictions. Students remain in their home institutions, but are linked up (through e-mail and/or internet video-conferencing) to hone their skills in cross-border legal communication. Examples include a contract negotiation and renegotiation simulation involving students in Canberra and Tokyo. The main challenge is logistics, including the extra time involved particularly for instructors.

Nonetheless, all six panelists agree that transnational legal education is no longer a possibility. It is already a reality, but one requiring further experiments and efforts to train the new generation of globally aware law graduates demanded by legal professions, the public and private sectors, and citizens world-wide.

 Source: LSN Public International Law Vol. 3 No. 55,  07/25/2008