<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aspen wigging me out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/10/09/aspen-wigging-me-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/10/09/aspen-wigging-me-out/</link>
	<description>Brought to you by the Legal Research instructors at Stanford Law School</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Martin</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/10/09/aspen-wigging-me-out/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchplus.wordpress.com/?p=640#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a new problem, of course, though its scale has grown to match the depredations of Wall Street. 30 years ago I analyzed in detail the changes or additions in an expensive supplement from a publisher that has since been purchased and found little to justify a subscription. It is my belief that for treatises the value is largely in the original publication to which the author gave his full attention and not in the supplements that I believe to be issued by flunkies of the publisher or, at best, students hired by the author. Buy the original; skip the supplement; save your money for more monographs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a new problem, of course, though its scale has grown to match the depredations of Wall Street. 30 years ago I analyzed in detail the changes or additions in an expensive supplement from a publisher that has since been purchased and found little to justify a subscription. It is my belief that for treatises the value is largely in the original publication to which the author gave his full attention and not in the supplements that I believe to be issued by flunkies of the publisher or, at best, students hired by the author. Buy the original; skip the supplement; save your money for more monographs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://legalresearchplus.com/2008/10/09/aspen-wigging-me-out/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Betsy McKenzie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://legalresearchplus.wordpress.com/?p=640#comment-461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You tell &#039;em!  It would take a good deal of careful analysis of these supplements to tell how much new material is actually being added. But I am skeptical about that, as well.   But even if every little bit is new and really great, that is just a whole lot of money to charge. That&#039;s outrageous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You tell &#8216;em!  It would take a good deal of careful analysis of these supplements to tell how much new material is actually being added. But I am skeptical about that, as well.   But even if every little bit is new and really great, that is just a whole lot of money to charge. That&#8217;s outrageous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

