Case reversed for allowing Wikipedia entry as evidence

From the Examiner.com

Bergen judge reversed for allowing Wikipedia entry as evidence

By Jerry DeMarco

North Jersey Crime Examiner

A Bergen County judge mistakenly let a collection company lawyer cover a gap in evidence against a credit-card holder by using a Wikipedia page, a state appeals court has ruled.

. . .

“Such a malleable source of information is inherently unreliable and clearly not one whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned,” they added.

. . .

The Legal Workshop – New, Online and Free

A new, free, on-line publication — The Legal Workshop.

STANFORD, Calif., Apr 21, 2009 — A consortium of America’s most influential law reviews today launched The Legal Workshop ( www.legalworkshop.org), a free, online magazine featuring articles based on legal scholarship published in the print editions of seven participating law reviews: Stanford Law Review, New York University Law Review, Cornell Law Review, Duke Law Journal, Georgetown Law Journal, Northwestern Law Review, and University of Chicago Law Review.

The Legal Workshop features short, plain-English articles about legal issues and ideas, written by an author whose related, full-length work of scholarship is forthcoming in one of the participating law reviews. But The Legal Workshop does not house a collection of abstracts. Instead, it offers an engaging alternative to traditional academic articles that run 30,000 words with footnotes, enabling scholars to present their well-formulated opinions and their research to a wider audience. In addition to making legal ideas understandable, The Legal Workshop seeks to house the best of legal scholarship in one place–making it easier for readers to find the best writing about all areas of law.

A not-for-profit joint venture, The Legal Workshop was started and is operated by current and former student editors of the law reviews. The idea for collaboration surfaced in 2006 when student editors struggled to identify viable Internet strategies for their journals, and Joe Edelheit Ross, who was president of the Stanford Law Review at the time, came up with the core idea. Rather than attempt to develop and run a stand-alone website, which the law journals at Harvard and Yale have since tried to do, law review editors at Stanford envisioned a web magazine that would offer a wider selection of content culled from several top journals. Editors at NYU quickly signed on to the idea and joined Stanford editors in taking the lead to create an online legal scholarship magazine.

Since the 1950s, law reviews have been an influential factor in federal court decisions, in shaping public policy, and in the hiring and tenure of law faculty. For example, a Stanford Law Review article published in 1949 has been cited in 12 major Supreme Court opinions, including the 1965 landmark case Griswold v. Connecticut, which recognized a right to privacy. Unlike in any other academic discipline, law professors are not published by peers–they are published in law reviews that are operated and edited by law students. Many law review presidents and editors have gone on to achieve great success and wield great influence: Barack Obama was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review; Brooksley Born–who warned against impending global economic crisis and was awarded the John F. Kennedy Medal of Courage this year–was the first woman president of the Stanford Law Review; former Chief Justice of the United States William H. Rehnquist, and former Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor–the first woman Supreme Court justice–were both Stanford Law Review editors.

In recent years, however, law reviews have been losing their influence and readership. Some attribute this steady decline to impenetrable jargon and arcane subject matter. But other factors, such as limited availability and the rapid pace of legal developments in an electronic world, have played roles as well.

“The problem is that most law reviews make little effort to reach non-academic audiences. And because they still effectively help professors gain tenure–’publish or perish’ is here to stay–there is little incentive to innovate,” said Michael Montano, the Stanford Law School student who led the website’s development. “But as a profession we owe it to the public to produce work that is relevant to society as a whole.”

“Our goal was to provide free legal scholarship in a format accessible to laypersons,” said Matt Lawrence, an NYU Law School student integral to the website’s launch. “Legal blogs cover the free part and have rapid reaction times, but they often tend to be attuned solely to the needs of experts.”

“The web has been waiting for something like this,” added Lithwick, “We can rightly rejoice that it is finally here.”

The Legal Workshop is named after the practice by which scholars often develop their work in small-group dialogues. All seven of the law schools currently participating in the venture appear on U.S. News and World Report’s list of the top fifteen law schools in America. Other top schools are actively seeking membership.

World Digital Library

In the World Digital Library, a coalition of national libraries and UNESCO have put some of humanity’s earliest written works online Tuesday, “not to compete with Google or Wikipedia but to pique young readers’ interest — and get them reading books.” They reportedly include ancient Chinese oracle bones and the first European map of the New World. See the Associated Press story.

Recent Paper on Data Breach Notification Law Around the Globe

A new paper on data breach notification law around the globe is available:

Alana Maurushat, “Data Breach Notification Law Across the World from California to Australia” (April 2009). University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series. University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series 2009. Working Paper 11.

The abstract reads:

Data breach notification and disclosure laws are emerging around the globe. The following article and table examine the specifics of data breach notification frameworks in multiple jurisdictions. Over the year of 2008, Alana Maurushat of the Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre, with research assistance from David Vaile and student interns Renee Watts, Nathalie Pala, Michael Whitbread, Eugenie Kyung-Eun Hwang and David Chau, compiled the data. The table represents a detailed survey of data breach disclosure requirements in 25 countries, conducted by surveying those current or proposed statutory or similar instruments setting out the nature and conditions of such requirements to give notice. The Centre hopes that the table will be useful to compare and contrast elements of data breach notification schemes. The researchers at the CLPC will research the effectiveness of such schemes in future projects.

Hat tip to DocuTicker.

National Academies Reports Available Online

Earlier this month the National Academies (composed of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council) announced the digital availability — “free, searchable, and in full text” — of more than 9,000 reports from 1863 to 1997 upon completion of the first phase of a partnership with (who else!?!) Google. The entire collection of some 11,000 reports should be digitized by 2001.

Hat tip to ResourceShelf.

Centre for German Legal Information

The Centre for German Legal Information provides links to English language versions of German statutes, regulations, and court opinions. A small number of state laws and court decisions are also available.  The site also lists links to government ministries, courts, bar associations, and legal research portals.

Centre for German Legal Information http://www.cgerli.org/index.php?id=61

How the E-Book Will Change The Way We Read and Write

From today’s Wall Street Journal:  The Journal Report – Technology

How the E-Book Will Change The Way We Read and Write

“Author Steven Johnson outlines a future with more books, more distractions — and the end of reading alone.”

. . . Before too long, you’ll be able to create a kind of shadow version of your entire library, including every book you’ve ever read — as a child, as a teenager, as a college student, as an adult. Every word in that library will be searchable. It is hard to overstate the impact that this kind of shift will have on scholarship. Entirely new forms of discovery will be possible. Imagine a software tool that scans through the bibliographies of the 20 books you’ve read on a specific topic, and comes up with the most-cited work in those bibliographies that you haven’t encountered yet.

On the front lines of Twitter with founders Stone and Williams

From today’s Wall Street Journal (Saturday/Sunday, April 18 – 19, 2009, p. A11):

THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW with Evan Williams and Biz Stone / By Michael S. Malone

The Twitter Revolution

From the article:

“Under the guise of a fun communications tool, Twitter is building one of the world’s most valuable real-time information caches.”

Table of Contents Service for Spanish Journals

The information portal of the Government of the Community(region)of Valencia in Spain maintains the Bolsum Electrònic database, which includes table of contents for many Spanish legal and social science journals. Most of the journal have TOC information from the inception of the publication. Links to the journals are also provided.

Bolsum Electrònic

Catalan/ Valencian version

http://www1.pre.gva.es/argos/va/contenido_general/recursos/bolsum/listado_de_revistas_por_orden_alfabetico/?no_cache=1

Spanish version

http://www1.pre.gva.es/argos/es/contenido_general/recursos/bolsum/listado_de_revistas_por_orden_alfabetico/?no_cache=1