New International IP book: Teaching of Intellectual Property – Principles and Methods

The World Intellectual Property Organization and Cambridge University Press have recently published a handbook for professors to help develop international intellectual property law courses. There are chapters devoted to copyright, patent and trademarks, as well as content covering distance learning and skills training. The editors are all officials of WIPO; in fact Mr. Takagi is WIPO’s executive director.

Teaching of Intellectual Property: Principles and Methods.

Authors: Yo Takagi, Larry Allman & Mpazi A. Sinjela. 

ISBN 9780521716468 

WIPO, 2008

 http://www.wipo.int/ebookshop?cart_id=795588-43657301&lang=eng&cmd=display_pub&cat_id=1257

Description from the WIPO Web site:

Intellectual property (IP) comprises not only the valuable economic assets of private firms, but also the social and cultural assets of society. The potential impact of intellectual property assets is so great that it is likely to have a considerable effect on national and international economic development in the future. Despite this, the area of IP education is relatively new to many academic institutions, and principles and methods in teaching IP are still evolving. Against this backdrop, a number of internationally renowned professors and practitioners share their teaching techniques in their particular fields of expertise, including what they consider should be taught in terms of coursework. The result is a valuable handbook for teachers and those wishing to get up to speed on international IP issues.

Table of contents available at: http://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/16468/frontmatter/9780521716468_frontmatter.pdf

http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521716468

 

Understanding and Mastering The Bluebook

A recent legal research and writing (LRW) title of interest concerning The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation) is:

Understanding and Mastering The Bluebook : A Guide for Students and Practitioners
by Linda J. Barris

Type:        Book; English
Publisher:    Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, ©2007.
ISBN:    9781594603655 1594603650
OCLC:    123391085
Related Subjects:
Citation of legal authorities — United States.
Annotations and citations (Law) — United States.

Table of Contents:
Chapter 1: Getting Started
Chapter 2: Cases
Chapter 3: Statutes
Chapter 4: Constitutions
Chapter 5: Secondary Sources
Chapter 6: Procedural and Court Rules
Chapter 7: Litigation Documents and Record Citations
Chapter 8: Signals and Explanatory Parentheticals
Chapter 9:    Quotations
Chapter 10: Capitalization
Chapter 11: Numbers, Numerals and Symbols
Appendix: Citing Electronic Sources

Jonathan Zittrain on The Colbert Report tonight!

Set those TiVos!

Other law professors who have been on The Colbert Report include our Richard Ford and Harvard’s Charles Nesson.

Read more about Jonathan Zittrain here and read his blog here.

Jonathan Zittrain was also on The Charlie Rose show on May 13, 2008 and our library holds a DVD of that program.

Update:  Jonathan Zittrain’s interview on The Colbert Report can be seen here.

Also, Concurring Opinions notes that law professor Neal Katyal was also on the Colbert Report with JZ and includes links to both appearances.  Neal Katyal has been on the show before too; see here and here.

From Concurring Opinions:

Mike Madison points out that Jonathan Zittrain was on Colbert last night. But so was Neal Katyal. Is this the making of an unofficial showdown? Will academic stature be determined by who can roll with the Colbert? Who offers truthiness? Probably not on both counts.

Given my tech bent, I lean towards Zittrain. Nonetheless, I honestly think both did rather well and enjoyed seeing them navigate the oddity of a comedy interview.

 

 

Harvard Law Library Director in the News

John Palfrey, Executive Director of the Harvard Law School Berkman Center for Internet & Society and new library director at HLS, was featured in a terrific story in USA Today on Wednesday, “Pioneers steer the course of cyberspace.”  The article references John’s forthcoming book, Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives

The digital generation gap

Berkman Executive Director John Palfrey posits the digital revolution’s most enduring change is neither the new business models nor Google’s search algorithms: It’s the massive generation gap between those who were “born digital” and those who were not.

Palfrey’s forthcoming book, Born Digital, is an offspring of the center’s extensive work on “digital natives,” children who were born into and raised in the digital world.

“We’re talking about the future behavior of human beings on the Internet,” says Palfrey, who is head of the Harvard Law School Library. “Digital natives use technology to either be more productive or distracted. The challenge is making the most of (their skills).”

“Jet Ski research” – Is Google Making Us Stoopid?

Our alumnus Matt Asay has a post on The Open Road about a must-read cover story in the latest issue of The Atlantic, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” by Nicholas Carr.

From The Atlantic article:

. . .

My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles. Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.
 . . .
 . . . a recently published study of online research habits, conducted by scholars from University College London, suggests that we may well be in the midst of a sea change in the way we read and think. As part of the five-year research program, the scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors to two popular research sites, one operated by the British Library and one by a U.K. educational consortium, that provide access to journal articles, e-books, and other sources of written information. They found that people using the sites exhibited “a form of skimming activity,” hopping from one source to another and rarely returning to any source they’d already visited. They typically read no more than one or two pages of an article or book before they would “bounce” out to another site. Sometimes they’d save a long article, but there’s no evidence that they ever went back and actually read it.

The authors of the study report:

It is clear that users are not reading online in the traditional sense; indeed there are signs that new forms of “reading” are emerging as users “power browse” horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts going for quick wins. It almost seems that they go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense.
. . .

 The article has worried and inspired Matt thusly:

Which is why I’m returning to my books. I read a fair amount–the classics, mostly–but generally only when I’m traveling. As Carr points out, I, too, have difficulty reading when my computer beckons with instant gratification. I read each night to my kids before they go to bed, but Carr’s article has me thinking that I need to return to doing the same.

Over the weekend, the Asays determined that we’re going to have “reading time” each night for an hour before bed. Everyone (except my 5- and 3-year-old) will read for an hour. My kids were already doing this. The change is for me and for my wife. I need to exercise my brain to think again, and not merely process.

After you’ve finished the article, you might want to add Carr’s recent book to your summer reading list:

 

Author: Carr, Nicholas G., 1959-
Title: The big switch : rewiring the world, from Edison to Google / Nicholas Carr.
      Portion of title: Rewiring the world, from Edison to Google
               Edition: 1st ed.
               Imprint: New York : W. W. Norton & Co., c2008.
  Physical Description: vii, 278 p. ; 25 cm.
                 Notes: Includes bibliographical references (p. 235-260) and
                        index.
Contents: Burden’s wheel — The inventor and his clerk — Digital millwork — Goodbye, Mr. Gates — The White City — World Wide Computer — From the many to the few — The great unbundling — Fighting the net — A spider’s web — iGod — Flame and filament.
          Subject (LC): Computers and civilization.
          Subject (LC): Information technology–Social aspects.
          Subject (LC): Technological innovations.
          Subject (LC): Internet.
                  ISBN: 9780393062281 (hardcover) : $25.95
                  ISBN: 0393062287 (hardcover) : $25.95

New legal research books

Here are cites to two new legal research books listed in this week’s Hein GreenSlips.

 Gabor, Francis A.
Guide to legal research and writing from the transnational perspective.
By Francis A. Gabor, Lake Mary, FL, Vandeplas Publishing, 2008. 148p. ISBN 9781600420405. $34.95. PAPER. Legal research & writing

Bouchoux, Deborah E.
Legal research explained.
By Deborah E. Bouchoux, Austin, TX, Wolters Kluwer Law and Business/Aspen, 2008. xxxi,376p. ISBN 9780735567221. $61.95. PAPER.
Legal research & writing ; Legal research
– United States
L.C. 2007032066 KF240

Stat-Spotting: A Field Guide to Identifying Dubious Data

Bless the university presses.  They produce fascinating — and affordable! — titles.  And their catalogs are fun to peruse too.  Yesterday I received the Fall 2008 catalog from the University of California Press and picked out numerous books to buy, including this one:

Joel Best
Stat-Spotting
A Field Guide to Identifying Dubious Data
 $19.95 [Thank you!]
978-0-520-25746-7
140 pages, 5-1/2 x 8-1/4 inches, 1 b/w photograph, 1 line illustration, 4 tables
October 2008, Available worldwide

 

“If you ever scan the newspaper, watch the TV news, or surf the blogs, you should read this charming book. If you’re a journalist [or reference librarian], read it twice.” — James M. Jasper

“As we now swim in information, much of it bogus or biased, spotting dubious data is super important. In Stat-Spotting, Joel Best plays off the format of field guides to give readers good, common sense ways not only to sense bad data but to understand what’s wrong. Broken up into short independent sections much like field guides to various flora or fauna, the book is easy and enjoyable to read. Easy, enjoyable, and valuable. I will recommend it to my students, and to others, as a resource for critical consumers of numbers.” –Bernard Madison, University of Arkansas

Description

Are four million women really battered to death by their husbands or boyfriends each year? Does a young person commit suicide every thirteen minutes in the United States? Is methamphetamine our number one drug problem today? Alarming statistics bombard our daily lives, appearing in the news, on the Web, seemingly everywhere. But all too often, even the most respected publications present numbers that are miscalculated, misinterpreted, hyped, or simply misleading. Following on the heels of his highly acclaimed Damned Lies and Statistics and More Damned Lies and Statistics, Joel Best now offers this practical field guide to help everyone identify questionable statistics. Entertaining, informative, and concise, Stat-Spotting is essential reading for people who want to be more savvy and critical consumers of news and information.

Stat-Spotting features:

* Pertinent examples from today’s news, including the number of deaths reported in Iraq, the threat of secondhand smoke, the increase in the number of overweight Americans, and many more

* A commonsense approach that doesn’t require advanced math or statistics

Just Research Book Review

In an earlier post (see “Just Google It First,” below) I mentioned Just Research, a popular legal research text here at Stanford.  Below is a book review of this book, written by Stanford law student Raaj S. Narayan for our Advanced Legal Research class. 

Narayan ALR Book Review

Costs and Software for an Institutional Digital Respository

A new book just arrived here in the law library (its catalog record is copied below).  A couple of callouts:

Costs:

“The organizations in the sample spent a mean of $ 78,802 to develop the repository, with costs ranging from essentially nothing to one half million dollars.  Median spending was $ 30,000. . . . Mean spending in the USA was less then elsewhere, perhaps reflecting the greater number of institutional initiators of digital repositories in the USA.”  p. 25.

Software:

A sixth of the libraries in the sample used Digital Commons sofware, and 28% of US-based repositories used this product. . . . 37.04% . . . used DSpace, including more than 83% of the developing countries . . . ” p. 26

 

Title: The international survey of institutional digital repositories.
Edition: 2008 ed.
Imprint: [New York] : Primary Research Group, c2007.
Physical Description: 127 p. ; 28 cm.
Note: Chiefly tables.
          Subject (LC): Institutional repositories–Statistics.
          Subject (LC): Digital libraries–Statistics.
          Subject (LC): Library surveys.
          Organization: Primary Research Group.
                  ISBN: 9781574400908
                  ISBN: 1574400908

CALL NUMBER                                           
ZA4081.86 .I58 2007

FROM LAW SCHOOL TO LAW PRACTICE: THE NEW ASSOCIATE’S GUIDE – Book Review

FROM LAW SCHOOL TO LAW PRACTICE: THE NEW ASSOCIATE’S GUIDE, by Suzanne B. O’Neill and Catherine Gerhauser Sparkman, with Ronald L. Jones, Contributing Author.  Philadelphia, PA: ALI-ABA, 3rd ed., 2008.  425 pp.  Paper $69.99.  ISBN 9780831800093.

Reviewed by Seth M. Gilmore, Stanford Law School, Stanford University.

How much is being a lawyer like being a law student? How similar is an associateship to other professional employment? In From Law School to Law Practice: The New Associate’s Guide, Suzanne B. O’Neill, Catherine Gerhauser Sparkman and Ronald L. Jones address these questions and others as they offer guidance to newly-minted attorneys seeking to bridge the gap between the academic and professional arena. The authors offer a host of practical advice to new attorneys, both those employed by firms, and those working as in-house counsel in corporate legal departments. The book is perhaps strongest when dispensing advice specifically geared towards the everyday requirements of the legal profession. However, there is also a significant amount of “common sense” guidance that would be broadly applicable to most professional environments. It’s here that the authors tend to get bogged down in discussions of rather mundane commonalities. These passages, while perhaps of marginal value to readers who have not previously been successfully entrusted with basic workplace responsibility, will merit little more than a casual glance for most of the book’s intended audience.

     O’Neill, Sparkman and Jones organize the volume around the central theme of “expectations”-both of the new attorney’s clients and supervisors, and ultimately, of the new attorney him or herself. Part I one of the book, entitled “Expectations of the Client”, takes a detailed look at what consumers of law firm services expect, not only from new associates, but from the partners who have overall responsibility for their matters, and, more holistically, from attorneys in general. Part II, “Expectations of Supervising Attorneys” provides comprehensive guidance about what new associates should be prepared to provide for their superiors, not just from a standpoint of legal research, writing and advocacy, but as professionals working in a complex, time-sensitive environment. In Part III of the book, the authors shift focus to “Expectations Within a Corporate Legal Department and of the Corporate Client”, providing insight into the requirements new attorneys who are working as in-house counsel should anticipate. Here the authors outline not only the specific expectations of clients and supervisors for junior attorneys working in-house, but also take an entire chapter to clearly delineate the specific differences between those expectations and the ones levied on associates working for large law firms. The book’s final section “Self-Expectations and Career Developments: Building a Bridge to Future Success”, is a comprehensive discussion of how a new attorney might best approach the task of planning and executing a successful tenure in the legal field, both in regard to employment at a firm or as an in-house counsel. Here, the authors shift their organizational paradigm slightly. The “expectation” motif that was used to order the three previous parts of the book becomes one of “opportunities” when future options for in-house corporate attorneys are treated.

     The book’s organization is logical, efficient and practical. Readers who wish to focus solely on specific advice for their chosen position (i.e. law firm associate or in-house counsel) are provided organizational guideposts that clearly indicate which sections of the text are geared towards their specific responsibilities. However, with pervasive requirements for professional interaction between the two groups, and the common occurrence of associates transitioning to in-house work, readers will likely find that even those sections geared toward “the other side” will be of interest. Similarly, the authors’ choice to structure the book around the theme of “expectations” proves useful to the reader. For new employees, the foremost question is often “what specifically will be required of me?” While expectations for new attorneys will inevitably vary to some degree from firm to firm and company to company, the book’s focus on this central concern seems a judicious one.

     As noted above, one of the areas in which the book struggles is in the tension between its focus on real-world, practical advice, and its dispensing of more vague, amorphous guidance with broad applicability to any professional setting. This is highlighted from the outset of Part I, in which the foundational principles of legal practice as the authors see them are laid out. They discuss in some detail the importance of not making assumptions, both about client expectations and in regards to the practice of law as whole, as well as the criticality of protecting reputations and relationships, and knowing your firm’s client base and mission. While these concepts are certainly crucial to any successful legal practice, they are certainly not unique to legal practice. This balancing act between explaining critical elements of legal work and reiterating what could at times be considered “common professional knowledge” continues throughout the book: at times the authors are successful at the task, at others they are not.

     Where they are more conclusively successful is in the use of practical examples to flesh out the generalized expectations around which the text is organized. Throughout the book, the authors follow up explanations of a client or supervisor expectation (for example “Expectation Number 13: Understand the Client’s Business”), with a framework of real-world examples that give substance and context to the principles proposed in the section. These come in two primary forms.

     First, immediately following the generalized guidance regarding the expectation, the authors frequently insert a “Consider” section. Here, they sketch out a brief case study of a legal problem that a new attorney might confront in practice, and the action that he or she might take in response. Followed by this is a brief synopsis of the “Actual Result” and either “What went right?” or “What went wrong?” (or sometimes both), with the occasional additional of other sections, such as “What alternatives would you develop?” or similar prompts.

     Second, at the conclusion of most of the expectation sections, the authors provide a sidebar entitled “Applying This Expectation to Your Responsibilities”. In these sections, they provide practical advice about how to put the more theoretical principles expressed in the proceeding section into practice, both in terms of questions practicing attorneys should ask themselves while working on a project, and in regard to specific guidance for concrete measures that should be taken to ensure successful results. Following their explanation of Expectation Number 13, for instance, the authors offer such guidance as “Acquire practical knowledge about . . . [i]ndustry trends affective client objectives . .  and [p]roblems particular to that industry” and “[b]ecome familiar with industry associations and trade journals.” With specific, practical guidance like this, they are more successful at the delicate task of providing guidance that might be broadly applicable across many different fields and considered to some extent to be “common knowledge” without coming off as patronizing to their audience.

     Another strength of the book is its willingness to frankly address weaknesses of the legal profession as a whole, specifically in terms of common traps and pitfalls for new attorneys to avoid. Thus, the authors candidly treat such ethical and client-focused requirements as “discussing when is it more cost-effective not to pursue legalistic solution”. As well, they offer guidance that parallels what they see as common weaknesses in the profession. In one section, for example, stressing how important it is that new attorneys remember at all times that lawyering does not occur in a vacuum-that no matter how elegant or attractive a legal solution might be, if it’s not workable or practical from a business perspective, then it’s simply not a “solution”. For new attorneys who have been accustomed to the rarefied air of academia, such practical reminders of the bottom line that underlies every law firm or corporate in-house legal department can be invaluable.
        

     As noted above, the book’s final section is unique in that it focuses not on the expectations of others for the new associate, but rather on the expectations (or “opportunities”) that new attorneys should have or pursue for themselves. This section is particularly useful in that it provides guidance that might otherwise be hard to come by. Whether or not he or she is forewarned and forearmed with effective guidance prior to beginning a project, a new attorney can expect at some point to receive direct and specific instructions regarding client and supervision expectations. However, when faced with what expectations they should have for themselves, lawyers fresh out of law school can be faced with an amorphous array of possibilities, with little or no concrete, structured guidance in place, or perhaps even necessarily available. Although ultimately the book is limited in the amount of personalized guidance it can provide, the lengthy array of opportunities it notes are a useful jumping off point, and will likely provide young attorneys a means by which to start thinking about how they might like to shape their careers.
        

     The book is not without the occasional blemish. The aforementioned struggle between generally useful and perhaps overbroad advice, a somewhat dry and clinical tone, and an exclusive focus on private firm and in-house work all prevent the authors’ work from being an unqualified success. Ultimately, however, they have collected and usefully organized a substantial volume of useful, reasonable advice that will serve any new associate well as they take the first steps in their professional legal career.