U.K. Librarians Loud About Price Increases

“British research libraries are protesting price increases by journal publishers, which come amid severe budget constraints in the U.K.”

From the Marketplace section of today’s Wall Street Journal:

Price Hikes Put U.K. Libraries in a Bind

Publishers Increase Fees for Research Journals as Government Issues Budget Constraints; ‘We Just Don’t Have the Money’

By Paul Sonne

From the report:

The concern among British librarians comes as the model for scholarly-journal pricing is under pressure. Many big education institutions buy huge packages of journals, in both print and digital versions, under bulk pricing deals that are steadily ratcheted up over time. With flat or declining budgets, some institutions are now looking for ways to save money without seriously curtailing access for students and researchers.

. . .
The situation could pose a challenge to publishing companies. “You can’t assume that you are going to raise your prices faster than the budget of your customers forever,” said Claudio Aspesi, senior media analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. “One day or another, this was going to be a problem.” . . .

 

To that I say:  Here, here.

Un-Legislative History

Wikipedia is often a boon for quick legal research about well-publicized matters.  It’s a great way to find where a statute is codified, or the background of a famous case.  When it comes to legislative history, though, sometimes Wikipedia’s a bust.  For anyone looking for a good example of why one must follow up with proper research into legislative history, please see Wikipedia’s entry on the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which passed in July 2010.  As of Nov. 16, 2010, Wikipedia has the following to say about the changes implemented by Title XI of Dodd-Frank:

“The Federal Reserve Act is amended to change the New York Federal Reserve President to a Presidential appointment, with the advice and consent of the Senate.”

In support of this assertion, Wikipedia cites and links to the Enrolled Final Version of HR 4173, available on the LOC’s Thomas page.  Unfortunately, Wikipedia gets it wrong:  The version of the bill that passed Congress removed that language (which had been proposed by the Senate but rejected by the House).  The Senate’s proposal in this regard was snipped on June 17, 2010, weeks before the final bill passed.  Legislative history research–including review of committee meeting transcripts–coupled with news and secondary source coverage bore out the truth.

We always offer cautions when it comes to Wikipedia, and now there’s a handy example to which we can refer.

UPDATE:  Thanks to our helpful reader, Wikipedia has been policed. . .while its lesson remains!

Resources and computers used by our students

Last week was the first week of classes.  We have 27 students in our Advanced Legal Research class.  We started the class by going  around the room and having the students tell us about their summer work experiences this past summer and, in particular, what research resources they used the msot.  Our students worked in a fascinating array of positions — law firms, government agencies, federal courts, NGOs, and  public interest organizations.   Listed below, as a most unscientific survey,  is the list of different resources and the number of students who reported using it.

Google – 18

Westlaw – 14

LexisNexis – 11

Books – 8

Various databases licensed by Stanford University – 6

City/municipal codes – 5

PACER – 4

A librarian – 4

HeinOnline – 3

EDGAR – 2

PubMed – 2

ONLaw (California CEB database) – 1

SSRN – 1

Also interesting to me was the number of glowing apples shining back at me from their open laptops.  Of the 27 students in the class, only 4 have Windows machines — the rest all have Macs!

The supremely expensive Supreme Court Reporter Advance Sheets Service

 

Our friend Carl Malamud just sent out a tweet:

If law librarians remain content to be purchasing agents, law libraries will die. *do* something! talk is easy, action requires effort.

Carl’s tweet arrived while I was reviewing our latest West monthly invoice.  I see that the Supreme Court Reporter advance sheet subscription has jumped up 34% from $ 547 last year to $ 730.69, and that’s with a $ 120.83 “Product Dependency Discount” (whatever that is).  Apparently the full sticker price for this subscription is $ 851.52.

I remember well when professors would sit in the faculty library,  smoke their pipes and read the advance sheets.  But those days are long, long gone.  Arguably SCOTUSblog.com and its wiki have more up-to-date information than the West advance sheets.  And SCOTUS itself does an admirable job of posting opinions.

Isn’t this service really quite obsolete?  If you think otherwise, I would welcome comments posted as we mull over whether or not we will cancel.

Yes, we have no bargains for books

I was reading this week’s Bloomberg Businessweek and its Global Economics article “Funny, It Doesn’t Feel Like a Recovery,” begins thusly:

Bargains are everywhere in America these days.  Men’s shirts and sweaters were 3.4 percent cheaper this April than a year earlier.  Prices also fell for eggs, peanut butter, bananas, potatoes, hotel and motel rooms, cosmetics, curtains, rugs, tools, and lawn care.  Excluding gasoline and other energy items, the consumer price index rose just 0.9 percent for the year. . . .

Bargains abound . . . everywhere except legal publishing perhaps.

A vendor just presented us with an agreement for a multi-year subscription.  If we sign up, instead of paying the “average 7.5% increases” the price will “increase annually at the rate of 3% for the remainder of the Term.”

Why?  Why must there be an automatic inflationary increase?  Why must law books go up while almost everything else is going down, according to Businessweek anyway.  Why can’t the contract language read “price will increase by no more than X% . . . ” with the publisher then making every effort to control, contain, and even reduce prices (negotiating with authors; buying cheaper paper, whatever it takes).  I know I’m being hopelessly naive here, but this mind-set of annual increases and our acquiesce in them is mind-boggling (my salary went up by 0% last year; the library’s materials budget went down by 15%).

Does the Internet Make You Smarter or Dumber?

Does the Internet Make You Smarter or Dumber?

The Wall Street Journal, Saturday/Sunday, June 5 – 6, 2010, p. W1

Amid the silly videos and spam are the roots of a new reading and writing culture, says Clay Shirky.

The cognitive effects are measurable: We’re turning into shallow thinkers, says Nicholas Carr.

1.8 billion – estimated number of internet users world-wide

34.5 hours – Time an average american spends watching television per week.  Source: Nielsen

56 seconds – Average time an American spends looking at a Web page.

This last statistic makes me feel good — here at Legal Research Plus our  average visit length is 1:25!

See the report at WSJ.com/Lifestyle

2 new journals for 2010: ILI Law Review and Arctic Review on Law & Politics

Indian Law Institute Law Review (free)

http://www.ili.ac.in/lawreview.htm

Volume 1, Issue 1

http://www.ili.ac.in/issues.htm

journal description:

The ILI Law Review is an initiative of the LL.M students of ILI to encourage scholarship in the fields of law and allied subjects among the budding scholars of ILI and other Universities and Colleges in India and abroad.  It is expected that the ILI Law Review will cater to the felt needs of scholars, researchers, lawyers, policy makers and dedicated law students in the diverse arenas of law

The ILI Law Review will be an Online Journal and each article submitted for publication goes through a three-tier selection process. The selection process includes vetting of the articles by students, experts from ILI faculty and finally by an external expert. There after the student editors of the journal edits the articles selected for publication as per the Journal of Indian Law Institute format.  It is also important to note that the ILI Law Review is proposed to be an environment friendly publication because at no stage of the publication papers are used. Many factors make the Law Review unique and different from other journals. It is the first online law journal in the country to be assigned with the ISSN code, which is indicative of its quality and standard. The involvement of students at every stage of the process ensures that they are exposed to editing procedures under expert guidance. As we believe in unconditional dissemination of knowledge, the journal is open-sourced and all articles are available free of any cost. Through its peer-reviewed processes and constant dedication to maintain international standards, the ILI Law Review aims to be a vehicle of quality legal scholarship within the country and abroad.

Arctic Review on Law and Politics.

Roughly $75 per year for two issues.

http://akademiskweb.com/index.asp?id=129002

Journal description from their Web site:

Arctic Review on Law and Politics is a scientific journal with the goal to publish articles in the field of law and politics. Law and Politics is understood in a wide sense, as it also encompasses research in disciplines like economics, sociology, human geography and social anthropology.

The journal focuses on the arctic and the northern areas, and the aim is to provide new knowledge and understanding of fundamental issues in these areas and thus become a rostrum for debates over the development in the northern areas. The goal is to cover issues like management of resources, environmental issues including economic and legal questions of climate change, and law of the sea. Other topics of current interest are jurisdictional matters and indigenous people’s rights.

Arctic Review on Law and Politics takes aim to be an international journal at a high academic level, publishing peer reviewed articles in two volumes per year.

The journal is established in the «Arctic Capital» of Norway, Tromsø, where the editor-in-chief also is located. In addition to the editor, the editorial board consists of national co-editors from the other arctic countries; Canada, Denmark, Finland, Russia, Sweden and USA.

Legal Publishing in Antebellum America

We just received this very interesting looking book today by law professor M. H. Hoeflich (catalog record below).

From the jacket:

Legal Publishing in Antebellum America presents a history of the law book publishing and distribution industry in the United States.  Part business history, part legal history, part information history, M. H. Hoeflich’s book shows how various developments such as printing and binding, the introduction of railroads, and the expansion of mail service contributed to the growth of the industry from an essentially local one to a national scale.  Furthermore, the book ties the spread of a particular approach to law, that is, the “scientific approach” championed by northeastern jurists, to the growth of law publishing and law bookselling, and shows that the two were critically intertwined.

Here’s a paragraph from the first chapter that helps set the stage for what follows:

In the period from the founding of the new republic to the beginning of the Civil War, American law and the American legal profession underwent profound changes.  This was a period of extensive legal syncretism of American and English law.  English law was neither wholly rejected nor wholly accepted, and every lawyer during this period had to know something of English statutes and cases as well as the great treatise literature that had dominated English legal thought, particularly the works of Coke and Blackstone.  At the same time each of the new American states and the new federal government were developing legal literatures of their own, in courts, in legislatures, and in law offices and law schools.  No antebellum American lawyer could risk not knowing his own state’s and nation’s laws.  Finally, American lawyers of the period were cosmopolitan in their thinking and writing.  If they could not find relevant English or American law they would gladly look to the law of ancient Rome, and of contemporary France or Germany, among others.  The new nation in its formative period offered lawyers unparalled freedom to look widely for their authorities.

The author, in a Bibliographical Note, explains that he has “established a Web site: www.antebellumlegalpublishing.org. On this site will be found detailed bibliographies of both primary and secondary sources used in this volume, digital reproductions of many of these sources, and comments about these sources including, where useful, location information.”  This site will be kept current as new material is discovered and it will also provide a wiki forum for readers to post comments.

Here’s its catalog record:

Author: Hoeflich, Michael H.

Title: Legal publishing in antebellum America / M.H.
                        Hoeflich.

Related e-resource: Contributor biographical information
http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1005/2009053585-b.html

Electronic version: Table of contents only
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1005/2009053585-t.html

Imprint: New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010.

  Physical Description: xiv, 190 p. ; 24 cm.
                      : Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. A
                        bookish profession; 2. Birth of the law book trade; 3.
                        Spreading the word: catalogues and cultivation; 4.
                        Bidding for law books; 5. Risk, subscriptions, and
                        status; 6. John Livingston, esq.: law bookseller as
                        cultural entrepreneur; 7. Conclusion: selling the law
                        in antebellum America.
               Summary: “Legal Publishing in Antebellum America presents a
                        history of the law book publishing and distribution
                        industry in the United States. Part business history,
                        part legal history, part history of information
                        diffusion, M. H. Hoeflich shows how various
                        developments in printing and bookbinding, the
                        introduction of railroads, and the expansion of mail
                        service contributed to the growth of the industry from
                        an essentially local industry to a national industry.
                        Furthermore, the book ties the spread of a particular
                        approach to law, that is, the “scientific approach,”
                        championed by Northeastern American jurists to the
                        growth of law publishing and law book selling and
                        shows that the two were critically
                        intertwined”–Provided by publisher.
          Subject (LC): Legal literature–Publishing–United
                        States–History–18th century.
          Subject (LC): Legal literature–Publishing–United
                        States–History–19th century.
                  ISBN: 9780521192064
                  ISBN: 0521192064

Law libraries as innovation centers

Harvard Law Library director John Palfrey is quoted in this story from today’s Boston Globe:

Boston Globe, Monday, May 24, 2010

Home / News / Education  

Harvard’s paper cuts
School library works to maintain stature in the shift to digitalBy Tracy Jan

The thin, tattered book, an 1899 dissertation on Homer, written in French, is tucked into one of the more than 40 shelves devoted to the epic poet in the stacks of Widener Library. Collecting obscure works like this one has helped Harvard amass the world’s largest university library…”Libraries have to think of themselves as innovation centers, and not just repeat what we have done in the past, “said Harvard Law professor John Palfrey, who is a leading a project to shape the future of the school’s libraries.

. . .

Palfrey has added engineers, statisticians, and graphic designers to the law school library staff. His team is working on a Web application that browses a virtual bookshelf with works stacked against one another to re-create the experience of wandering through musty stacks and serendipitously stumbling upon titles.

The library is also planning to build a virtual reference desk, where students who rarely seek the help of librarians can solicit research advice without having to set foot in a library. Librarians would assist students through e-mail, instant messaging, text messaging, and Skype.

. . .

And Harvard Law School is in discussions with other law schools about having each school collect in specialized areas.

. . .