Finding Solicitor General Briefs (for free)

Updated

Quite a few of us were trying to unravel a few mysterious (to us, at least) citations in the DOJ  letter “RE: Physician Hospitals of America v. Sebelius, No. 11-40631.”

We know now that they are Solicitor General briefs from the DOJ (and, proper attribution of these cites as briefs would have removed all confusion).

While the DOJ researchers cite to Westlaw references that we do not have access to in academia, it would have been far easier to follow their research trail if they had only cited to the free versions of the briefs posted on the DOJ website.

The DOJ Solicitor General site has online briefs going back to 1982.  This site is easy to use.  You can browse by year, subject matter and client.  And, it is all freely available — many as PDFs.

Bloomberg Adds BNA Content to BLAW

Bloomberg L.P. has added Bureau of National Affairs (BNA) content to the Bloomberg BLAW system.

Please see the Bloomberg BNA press release here.

And additional coverage is here.

Cross-posted on Law Library Blog.

Boing Boing Posting “Liberating America’s Secret, For-Pay Laws”

Boing Boing, a group blog that started out as a zine, has recently posted an interesting and provocative piece by Carl Malamud of Public.Resource.Org:

Liberating America’s Secret, For-Pay Laws

Cross-posted on Law Library Blog.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) Report on Nepotism in the U.S. Congress

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has released a report on nepotism in the U.S. Congress — please see:

“Family Affair” Report Details Nepotism in Congress

A PDF of the full report is here.

KEY FINDINGS:

  • 82 members (40 Democrats and 42 Republicans) paid family members through their congressional offices, campaign committees and political action committees (PACs);
  • 44 members (20 Democrats and 24 Republicans) have family members who lobby or are employed in government affairs;
  • 90 members (42 Democrats and 48 Republicans) have paid a family business, employer, or associated nonprofit;
  • 20 members (13 Democrats and 7 Republicans) used their campaign money to contribute to a family member’s political campaign;
  • 14 members (6 Democrats and 8 Republicans) charged interest on personal loans they made to their own campaigns;
  • 38 members (24 Democrats and 14 Republicans) earmarked to a family business, employer, or associated nonprofit.

Bloomberg Law (BLAW) Wins American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) 2012 New Product Award

Bloomberg Law (BLAW) has won the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) 2012 new product award, recognizing BLAW’s innovation in providing access to legal information.

Please see:

BLOOMBERG LAW NAMED 2012 NEW PRODUCT OF THE YEAR BY THE AALL

&

(AALL) NEW PRODUCT AWARD

Hat tip to Law Librarian Blog here.

Class Action Brought Against West Publishing Corporation for Mass Copyright Infringement

Following up earlier LegalResearchPlus posts on recently-filed legal actions as to the copying/sale of court filings/lawyers’ briefs and related matters — here, here, and here, West Hartford, Connecticut attorney and lead plaintiff David J. Heinlein on Wednesday 14 March 2012 brought a class action (docket no. 12-00386) against West Publishing Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut — please see:

Article: Attorney Class Claims West Violates Copyright

&

Class Action Complaint (U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00386, March 14, 2012)

Restatements of Indian Law

Although the press release from the Supreme Court of India about the Restatements of Indian Law appeared last October, I only recently noticed that the first three restatements were available for purchase. The first three restatement topics are: legislative privilege, contempt of court, and public interest litigation.

The restatements are a joint project of the Indian Law Institute and the Supreme Court Project Committee of Restatement of Indian Law.

The press release mentions that three separate publishers were selected for the restatements: Lexis Nexis-Butterworths; CCH,and Universal Law Publishing Co. In the future, it would be nice to have the restatements posted on the Legal Information Institute of India (LIIofIndia) or IndLII.

From the Press Release

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=76582

Legislative Privilege – This subject was chosen partly on account of the sharp focus it brings to the principle of ‘checks and balances’ vis-a-vis the two important organs of State – the Legislature and the Judiciary.

 

Contempt of Court – The subject was chosen on account of the fact that the power of contempt is a necessary concomitant of a court of record. It must be exercised judiciously, in a manner that balances the need for preserving and upholding the rule of law as well as the integrity of the judicial system, while at the same time avoiding untoward incursions into that precious right of freedom of speech and expression.

 

Public Interest Litigation – The Committee chose ‘Public Interest Litigation’ as the third area for restatement on account of the unique contribution of the Supreme Court of India in facilitating access to justice by liberalizing the principle of locus standi. The circuitous journey of PIL and associated discrete judicial thoughts necessitated a clarion, which this restatement aims at.

Online Historical World Maps

Old Maps Online, a gateway to historical maps in libraries around the world, has recently been launched.

See here for descriptions of the online digital map collections that are accessible/searchable, as well a listing of participating contributors.

Last but not least, here is the “Search” link.

Hat tip to ResourceShelf.com.

Cross-posted at Law Library Blog.

French Law 2012-287: Database of Digitized 20th Century Books

Law 2012-287 was published in the Official Journal of France on March 2, 2012. The law, which amended France’s Intellectual Property Code, proposes building a free, public database of digitized books that were published in the 20th Century and are no longer in commercial distribution. The Bibliothèque national de France (BNF) would be in charge of creating and administering the database.

Publishers and rights holders will have 6 months to challenge inclusion of a book in the database. It also appears that after raising a challenge, publishers have three years to demonstrate a market for the book, or that they have created their own digitized version.

I did not see a specific appropriation of funds in the bill, so it is unclear to me how the BNF will finance the project.

Reaction on French law librarian mailing lists and blogs has been positive, but muted. Wait and see seems to be the prevailing sentiment.

Whether this bill leads to a free database or not, let’s hope that it spurs debate in France, Europe, and across the Atlantic, about the role of digitized books in society.

Law 2012-287 relative à l’exploitation numérique des livres indisponibles du XXe siècle.

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jopdf/common/jo_pdf.jsp?numJO=0&dateJO=20120302&numTexte=1&pageDebut=03986&pageFin=03988

Full-text of the bill and links to legislative history materials are available at

http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/ta/ta0865.asp

Some authors’ groups have already criticized the bill for ignoring copyright law. For example, see the petition circulated by writer Yal Ayerdhal:

http://www.petitionpublique.fr/?pi=P2012N21047

Additional commentary on the bill from the Rue89 blog

http://www.rue89.com/rue89-culture/2012/03/03/numerisation-des-livres-quon-nedite-plus-qui-y-gagne-229855