Florida Democratic Party Lawsuit over Early Voter Wait Times – Case Documents

The Florida Democratic Party has filed a lawsuit in federal court regarding the delays early voter were facing at the polls in Florida.

For more about this litigation, see the New York Times blog post and the Politico posting.

Case information:

Florida Democratic Party v. Ken Detzner

U.S. District Court
Southern District of Florida (Miami)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-24000-JAL

Complaint for Temporary Restraining Oder and Emergency Injunctive Relief.  [Exhibit 1-A, Exhibit 1-B, Exhibit 1-C] (11/4/2012)

NOTICE by Penelope Townsley of Corrected Suggestion of Mootness as to Miami-Dade County (11/5/2012)

EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order ( Responses due by 11/23/2012), MOTION for Immediate Injunctive Relief Preliminary Injunction by Florida Democratic Party. (11/5/2012)

MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Florida Democratic Party (11/5/2012)

NOTICE by Susan Bucher re Complaint,  MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction of Suggestion of Mootness as to Palm Beach County (Exhibit #1 Absentee Ballots – Article)  (11/5/2012)




Election fact checking

The sheer volume of election coverage can be daunting to follow for even the most hard-core election junkie, let alone the casual observer. A few sites do everyone the favor of breaking campaign reports and statements down to the facts, attempting to separate the truth from the truthiness.

FactCheck.org is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. It is essentially a multimedia blog that responds to the factual assertions and allusions made in politics at the federal, state, and local levels. FactCheck.org’s staff elegantly analyzes candidates’ statements on such issues as a potential gas price fix for factual consistency. They dutifully list their reference sources and, for contextual emphasis, they frequently provide audio and video links to the candidates’ actual comments.

PolitiFact, mentioned previously on FreeGovInfo, is a service of the St. Petersburg Times and Congressional Quarterly Inc. PolitiFact’s trademark is its Truth-O-Meter, which measures political statements on a scale of “True” to “Pants on fire.” It’s handy for those who want bottom-line analysis straight away. Like FactCheck.org, PolitiFact does have full articles with which it provides sources and multimedia links, although the analysis is not quite as deep. But PolitiFact does a better job of organizing and integrating its content: you can browse statements by Truth-O-Meter rating, by subject, by the person who said it, by whom it was said against, and even by where it was said (TV ad, blog post, speech, etc.).

Other interesting fact-checking sites include:

The Center for Public Integrity – A “nonprofit, nonpartisan, non-advocacy, independent journalism organization” that uses investigative journalism to examine political and campaign issues in depth. Of particular note is the Buying of the President site which looks at how money influences the presidential campaigns.

Opensecrets.org – Tracks money in politics and distills it into graphs, charts, and brief summaries. It is run by the non-partisan, non-profit Center for Responsive Politics.

The Fact Checker – A Washington Post blog that analyzes campaign statements in a similar way to FactCheck.org and PolitiFact. The difference here is that topics are prompted by user suggestions. It employs a “Pinocchio Test” similar to PolitiFact’s Truth-O-Meter.