Cross-posted on Law Library Blog.
The Governance and Social Development Resource Centre has put together a nice document library of citations and summaries of book chapters, reports, and journal articles arranged by keyword and by country. Links are provided to documents that are freely available on the Web. This site will help make up for the recent demise of the Intute portal.
From the Web site’s description:
“The document library is an up to date collection of the most credible publications available on governance, conflict and social development issues. It includes brief, policy-oriented summaries of each document highlighting the major findings and implications in an easy to read format, plus links to the full text online or by document delivery.
We monitor a wide range of publication sources weekly, including donors, NGOs and research institutes. Materials are carefully selected by our researchers to ensure that they are relevant to our topic area, demonstrate good practice or significant insight and represent a range of perspectives. Only the most credible and policy-relevant research, toolkits, analyses and case studies are included.”
Governance and Social Development Resource Centre Document Library
Climate ChangeS: A selection of the most recent and most interesting working papers on the economics of climate change.
From the description:
Climate ChangeS provides researchers with a timely and accurate update of new research papers on the Economics of Climate Change. On a weekly basis, links to the most recent and interesting working papers are aggregated from a variety of sources for easy and convenient reference. The focus is on research at the frontier, with most contributions appearing just a few days after having been released. For this reason, journal articles are not tracked.
The Gujarat National Law University of India is publishing the GNLU Journal of Law, Development and Politics.
From the description:
The GNLU Journal of law, Development and Politics (GJLDP) is a biannual, interdisciplinary journal which focuses on law, development and politics; is published by the Editorial Board of Gujarat National Law University and is administered by faculty and students of the University. The purpose of GJLDP is to provide our readers with information on recent developments affecting laws, development and various political issues.
The Student Editors alongwith Faculty Editors and an Editor-in-Chief of GJLDP, research, edit, and cite check the submitted manuscripts. The Student Editors are chosen annually by the faculty editors of the Journal.
The European Union recently released the following report:
Project Europe 2030: Challenges and Opportunities. A report to the European Council by the Reflection Group on the Future of the EU 2030.
RENEWING EUROPE’S ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL MODEL
GROWTH THROUGH KNOWLEDGE: EMPOWERING THE INDIVIDUAL…
THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOGRAPHY: AGEING, MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION
ENERGY SECURITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE: A NEW INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SECURITY: THE ETERNAL CHALLENGE
EUROPE IN THE WORLD: BECOMING AN ASSERTIVE PLAYER
THE EU AND ITS CITIZENS
BUILDING ON THE EU’S STRENGTHS
Members of the Reflection Group and authors of the report:
Felipe González Márquez, Chairman
Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, Vice-Chair
Jorma Ollila, Vice-Chair
Lykke Friis (until November 2009)
The London School of Economics and Political Science recently released: Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Change.
From the Executive Summary:
Climate policy, as it has been understood and practised by many governments of the world under the Kyoto Protocol approach, has failed to produce any discernable real world reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases in fifteen years. The underlying reason for this is that the UNFCCC/Kyoto model was structurally flawed and doomed to fail because it systematically misunderstood the nature of climate change as a policy issue between 1985 and 2009. However, the currently dominant approach has acquired immense political momentum because of the quantities of political capital sunk into it. But in any case the UNFCCC/Kyoto model of climate policy cannot continue because it crashed in late 2009. The Hartwell Paper sets and reviews this context; but doing so is not its sole or primary purpose.
The crash of 2009 presents an immense opportunity to set climate policy free to fly at last. The principal motivation and purpose of this Paper is to explain and to advance this opportunity. To do so involves understanding and accepting a startling proposition. It is now plain that it is not possible to have a ‘climate policy’ that has emissions reductions as the all encompassing goal. However, there are many other reasons why the decarbonisation of the global economy is highly desirable. Therefore, the Paper advocates a radical reframing – an inverting – of approach: accepting that decarbonisation will only be achieved successfully as a benefit contingent upon other goals which are politically attractive and relentlessly pragmatic.
The Paper therefore proposes that the organising principle of our effort should be the raising up of human dignity via three overarching objectives: ensuring energy access for all; ensuring that we develop in a manner that does not undermine the essential functioning of the Earth system; ensuring that our societies are adequately equipped to withstand the risks and dangers that come from all the vagaries of climate, whatever their cause may be.
It explains radical and practical ways to reduce non-CO2 human forcing of climate. It argues that improved climate risk management is a valid policy goal, and is not simply congruent with carbon policy. It explains the political prerequisite of energy efficiency strategies as a first step and documents how this can achieve real emissions reductions. But, above all, it emphasises the primacy of accelerating decarbonisation of energy supply. This calls for very substantially increased investment in innovation in non-carbon energy sources in order to diversify energy supply technologies. The ultimate goal of doing this is to develop non-carbon energy supplies at unsubsidised costs less than those using fossil fuels. The Hartwell Paper advocates funding this work by low hypothecated (dedicated) carbon taxes. It opens discussion on how to channel such money productively.
To reframe the climate issue around matters of human dignity is not just noble or necessary. It is also likely to be more effective than the approach of framing around human sinfulness –which has failed and will continue to fail.
Japan Times published an article on Tokyo’s new greenhouse gas emissions regime:
Tokyo’s CO2 cap-and-trade may set national standard.
by Maya Kaneko
Japan Times, Thursday , April 8th.
Financial Times also has an article on Tokyo’s new program.
Excerpts from the Japan Times article:
Under the leadership of Gov. Shintaro Ishihara, Tokyo aims to slash its carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gas emissions by 25 percent compared with 2000 levels by 2020. The program caps energy-related carbon dioxide emissions from some 1,330 offices and factories in the capital and allows for trading of emissions credits.
About 1,330 offices, commercial buildings and factories that annually consume the crude oil equivalent of more than 1,500 kiloliters of energy will be required to cut total carbon dioxide emissions over the fiscal 2010-2014 period by 6 percent to 8 percent from base-year levels.
Base-year levels are calculated from average emissions over a past period of three consecutive years between fiscal 2002 and 2007. Office buildings face an 8 percent target and factories are subject to a 6 percent goal.
In the fiscal 2015-2019 second phase, they will be required to slash emissions by 17 percent from their base-year levels.
To meet the targets, offices and factories can either make efforts on their own, such as updating to energy-saving equipment, or purchase emissions credits from other entities that have reduced their carbon dioxide output by more than the obligated levels in a system known as cap and trade.
They can also buy credits earned through reduction efforts by small and medium-size companies in Tokyo and the entities’ large-scale branch offices outside the capital. Renewable energy certificates issued by power generators can be also purchased.
Earthscan has released a new peer-reviewed journal: “Climate and Development.”
Published in partnership with the Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training (START), and supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
Unfortunately, the cost is $608 for U.S. institutions. Some free content from Voulme 1, Issue 1 is currently available on the journal Web site:
Climate and Development
hat tip to Joan Policastri.
The University of San Diego School of Law has published the inaugural issue of the San Diego Journal of Climate and Energy Law. $27 per issue.
San Diego Journal of Climate and Energy Law
Table of Contents of Volume 1, 2009
Ist Annual Climate & Energy Law Symposium: Federal Preemption or State Prerogative: California inteh Face of National Climate Policy – Richard Lazarus
Energy Efficiency and Federalism – Ann Carlson
State Greenhouse Gas Regulation, Federal Climate Change Legislation, and the Preemption Sword – William Buzbee
The History of State Action in the Environmental Realm: A Presumption Against Preemption in Climate Change Law – Victor Flatt
Regional Climate Regulation: From State Competition to State Collaboration – Lesley McAllister
Decentralizing Cap and Trade? The Question of State Stringency – Alice Kaswan
The Clean Water Act and Power Plant Cooling Water Intake Structrures – John Minan
Climate Law and Policy in North America: Prospects for Regionalism – Neil Craik and Joseph Dimento
Climate Adaption and Federalism: Mapping the Issues – Daniel Farber
Global Warming Policy Foundation is a UK based climate change site (more Bjorn Lomborg than Al Gore)
From the Web Site’s Information Page
The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is an all-party and non-party think tank and a registered educational charity
Our main purpose is to bring reason, integrity and balance to a debate that has become seriously unbalanced, irrationally alarmist, and all too often depressingly intolerant.
The GWPF’s primary purpose is to help restore balance and trust in the climate debate that is frequently distorted by prejudice and exaggeration
Our main focus is to analyse global warming policies and its economic and other implications. Our aim is to provide the most robust and reliable economic analysis and advice.
We intend to develop alternative policy options and to foster a proper debate (which at present scarcely exists) on the likely cost and consequences of current policies.
We are funded entirely by voluntary donations from a number of private individuals and charitable trusts. In order to make clear its complete independence, it does not accept gifts from either energy companies or anyone with a significant interest in an energy company.
Global Warming Policy Foundation http://www.thegwpf.org/